Evaluation for group D1 [Group-post]---2016/11/07

User group

is it clear to whom the service is made for?

Their target group is tourist.
is functionality well adjusted to the particular user group? (language, difficulty level, interests)
They have language options, their accessibility for old people need to improve. 
And as for our group, we do not have much interests for using this equipment instead of our phones. 

"the feeling"

will the user stay? return?

the same as the last questions, not so much interest because we can search all the stuff on our mobile phone. does the design keep the users “all the way”?
the alphabet search functionality does not serve enough information. The better one would be replaced by the functionality search, like what kind of museum.

Interaction and over arching structure

 it’s always clear what options and possibilities the interface provides?
there is a change screen button on the corner, it is not so clear the functionality. 

Design/composition 

 Does the design have a good structure and layout? Suggestions for change? Remove stuff?
The design has a good layout and structure, one suggestion is that, some screen is not necessary to separate, can be integrated together to make it more clear.

Primary and secondary functions 

there is no secondary function, and primary function fulfils the goal.

Conclusion

The function for map and path planning is normally design on the phone software, we suggest to add some second functions to make it more interest. On the other side, some functions need to be modified as described above, also the accessibility for disabled or old people also need to consider.